D0
国家社会科学基金项目(19BZZ008)
政制绩效的比较结果与其合法性密切相关,在比较中优势更多就意味着合法性更强。这 种 比 较 是 客观存在的,不以人的意志为转移,由于对程序正义的观察逐渐模糊,人们更多地会从结果正义的角度进 行评价。政制绩效比较往往会从横向和纵向两个方面展开,其评判要素则包括了性质上的对日常事务和 突发公共事件的处理,以及层级上的对高层和基层的绩效水平的考察。另外,为更贴近现实,舆论宣传导 向和公共教育的影响必须纳入考量。
Thecomparativeresultsofthepoliticalsystem performancearecloselyrelatedtoitslegitimacy,within whichmoreadvantagespossessesstrongerlegitimacy.Thiskindofcomparisonexistsobjectivelyindependentonthe willofhumanbeings.Astheobservationofthejusticeofproceduresisgraduallyblurred,peopletendtoevaluatethe politicalsystemperformancebasedontheconsequencesofjustice.Thecomparisonofthepoliticalsystemperformance isusuallycarriedoutfromthehorizontalandverticalaspects.Theevaluationelementsincludethehandlingofdailyaf- fairsandpublicemergenciesinnature,aswellastheinspectionoftheperformanceleveloftheseniormanagementand theprimarylevelinthehierarchy.Inaddition,theimpactofpublicadvocacyandpubliceducationmustbetakeninto account,bringingtheevaluationclosertothereality.
徐 贵,李路曲.绩效比较:政治制度合法性的重要来源[J].长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版),2021,36(4):85-96.XUGui, LILu-qu.PerformanceComparison:AnImportantSourceofPoliticalSystemLegitimacy[J]. Journal of Changsha University of Science & Technology Social Science,2021,36(4):85-96.