林德宏先生与桂起权先生科学思想史研究之比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

N031

基金项目:


A Comparison between the Studies of Lin Dehong and That of Gui Qiquan on Scientific Thinking History
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    改革开放后,国内一般科学史和科学思想史研究在20世纪90年代中期一度有复兴的迹象,但至今 还是处于“不温不火”的状况。这期间,林德宏先生的著作《科学思想史》和桂起权先生的著作《科学思想的源流》令人瞩目,这两本书既打上了深深的时代印记又彰显了学者各自的研究传统和风格。《科学思想史》以恩格斯的自然辩证法思想为指导进行科学思想史研究,将既成的科学思想和理论按年代延续的顺序较为系统地呈现出来并从哲学层面进行概括和评价,这种研究和叙述方式可称为“自然辩证法传统”。《科学思想的源流》以辩证的精神吸收西方科学哲学思想的合理内核,展现科学思想形成背后的解释模式,是科学哲学思想指导下科学思想“理性的重建”,这种研究和叙述方式可称为“科学哲学传统”。这两本著作对科技哲学专业的人才培养以及国内的科学史和科学思想史的专业研究,都作出了富有特色的突出贡献。

    Abstract:

    Till now, the study on both histories of general science and scientific thinking in China has remained in a "lukewarm" state , although it had once signed a revival in the mid-1990s after the reform and opening-up , during which History of Scientific Thinking by Lin Dehong and The Origins of Scientific Thinking by Gui Qiquan have attracted much attention. These two works not only bear the profound brand of the times but also highlight the scholars' respective distinct research traditions and styles. History of Scientific Thinking guided by Engels' idea of natural dialectics studies the history of scientific thought, presenting established scientific thinking and theories in a chronological order to summarize and evaluate them from a philosophical perspective, in a way that can be classified into "tradition of natural dialectics". While The Origins of Scientific Thinking, a "rational reconstruction" of scientific thinking guided by the philosophy of science, assimilates the rational core of western philosophy of science thinking with a dialectical spirit, revealing the explanatory models behind the formation of scientific thinking, which can be referred to as the "tradition of scientific philosophy". Both of these works have made distinctive and significant contributions to talent cultivation in the philosophy of science and to the professional research on both the history of science and scientific thinking in China.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王荣江.林德宏先生与桂起权先生科学思想史研究之比较[J].长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版),2023,38(5):42-52.
Wang Rongjiang. A Comparison between the Studies of Lin Dehong and That of Gui Qiquan on Scientific Thinking History[J]. Journal of Changsha University of Science & Technology Social Science,2023,38(5):42-52.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-10-26
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第位访问者
长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版) ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司